Franchise Factbook
Home retail other Great Clips
GC

Great Clips

retail other · HQ Minneapolis, MN
Partial FDD dataUnclaimed profile
Factbook Score: pending
Brand has 0 year(s) of Item 20 history in our current extraction; needs 3+ to compute a Factbook Score. Per methodology, this shows as 'Score pending — insufficient history', never a penalized score. See the methodology — this score can never be bought.
Data-integrity flags on this profile
  • infook
Total initial investment
$183K–$394K
FDD Item 7
Franchise fee
$71,100
FDD Item 5
Royalty
Franchised units
3-yr unit growth
CAGR from Item 20
Owner turnover
3-yr average, Item 20

What it really costs

Every cost figure this brand's filing discloses — not just the headline range

ExpenseLowHigh
Initial franchise fee$71,100$71,100
Total initial investment$183,400$394,400

Item 7 reports a total range, not a full line-item breakdown, in this brand's filing excerpt — the franchise fee is the only cost we can show separately today.

Earnings disclosure

Does the franchisor share performance data? No

This brand's filing does not include an Item 19 financial performance representation. That's common — a large share of franchisors disclose nothing here — but it means you should ask for unit-level economics directly during discovery calls.

Legal history

CLEAR
No bankruptcy disclosures for the franchisor or its officers.
NOT DISCLOSED
Non-compete term/radius wasn't separately quantified in the filing excerpt we have on file.

Profile changelog

Jul 30 Initial FDD data extracted (partial) — M0 pipeline batch

Similar brands to compare

Facts on this page are sourced from Great Clips's Franchise Disclosure Document. Source: https://franchisepanda.com/fdd-previews/great-clips-2023-franchise-disclosure-document-preview.pdf

Item 5 fee shown ($71,100-$101,200) is a range depending on program tier; low end ($71,100, single Franchise Agreement) recorded here. A Three Star Program fee range ($86,100-$116,200) and a Master Development Agreement fee ($6,000 first salon + $4,000/additional) also exist but are not captured in the single-value schema. Items 3, 4, 6, 12, 17, 19, 20 were referenced but not shown in the free preview, so left null.